Express Properties

Search Button

The Indian Express

The Financial Express

Latest News

EIW

Market Indicators

Screen

Celebrity Chat

Express Computers

Express Power

Letters

Advertisers Forum


Express Careers

Business Forum

Match Maker

Express Properties

Palki - Travel & Tours

Information Technology

Astrosurf

Eco-India

Dr Know

Morning Digest

Express Greeting

Graffiti

Crossword

Drumbeat: Ad Buzzaar


INDIAN EXPRESS FRONT PAGE

Politics

Business

Expressions

General

World

Sports

Leisure

States

 

Tuesday, September 22, 1998

HIV positive jawan moves court against dismissal

EXPRESS NEWS SERVICE  
CHANDIGARH, SEPT 21: An Army jawan, who tested positive for HIV, the AIDS-causing virus, has moved the Punjab and Haryana High Court challenging his dismissal.

In the first reported case of its kind in the Army, the NCO, L/Nk K Chandra Rao, from 325 Light Air Defence Regiment, was served a notice that he was to be discharged from service with effect from February 1, 1998 for having been placed in the ``low medical category''.

In his petition, admitted by a Division Bench, comprising Justices J L Gupta and N C KhichiRao, has alleged that the Army authorities' move violates the Army Act and is against the norms of social and natural justice.

However, senior officers from the Army's legal wing say that Army Rule 13 gives sweeping powers to authorities to terminate the services of any personnel, other than an officer, in the larger interest of the force or if the situation so warrants.

Rao, enrolled in the Army in December 1988, was diagnosed as suffering from an STD in 1993 and then tested HIV positivein 1996. He was admitted to the Command Hospital, Chandimandir. On March 3, 1997, a medical board put him in the ``B permanent category''. Subsequently, he joined regular service and performed his normal duties. He was to be medically examined again after six months.

According to the petition, Rao was served two letters dated October 4, 1997, and October 19, 1997, stating that he would be discharged from the Army due to his ``low medical category''. He was also served a notice dated October 28 by the Commanding Officer to show cause why his services should not be terminated.

The petitioner has also alleged that the medical board did not recommend his discharge. As per Army Rule 13, discharge in such cases is to be carried out only on the board's recommendation.

Copyright © 1998 Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd.


Top


Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd.

Bank of India

Astrosurf
 

Click here for a printer-friendly page Printer-friendly page

India Gift House


The Indian Express  |  The Financial Express  |  Latest News
Screen  |  Express Investment Week  |  Market Indicators  |  Express Computers
Astrosurf  |  Eco-India  |  Travel & Tourism  |  Information Technology  |  Drumbeat: Ad Buzzaar
Advertisers Forum  |  Career India  |  Business Forum  |  Match Maker  |  Express Properties