|
|
||||||
|
News Supplements
Express Interactive
|
Pakistan hand in hijacking too obvious By M.V. Kamath No matter how loudly the Pakistan Establishment may deny it, there can be no doubt that behind the hijacking of the Indian Airlines plane lies the hand of the ISI. The fact that the five hijackers arrived in Kathmandu by a Pakistani International Airlines (PIA) plane minutes before the Indian Airlines (IC-814) was to take off, simply walked through the arrival lounge to the departure lobby before emplaning unchecked cannot be attributed to coincidence. Musharraf
is a coward
Ever since the beginning of the 1990s Pakistan has been indulging in murder and mayhem in Jammu & Kashmir, all the while disowning any responsibility for the killing. In the last ten years the state has witnessed the killing of 16,850 innocent people, including women and children. Criminal acts, extortions and looting by so-called 'militants' between 1990 and 1997 have been valued at over Rs10.61-crore but many believe that it is an under estimation. Kashmiri Pandit families have been driven cut of their homes which have since then been occupied by terrorists. Even if they want to return to their ancestral homes, they cannot. The jobs that they once had have long been taken over by Kashmiri Muslims and the net result is that the last vestiges of Hinduism in Kashmir are being steadily wiped out. U.S.
turns nelson's eye Apart from these bestial acts the 'militants' are guilty of kidnapping 2,491 people including 20 foreigners and 135 women. Of these 1,036 had been brutally killed. In fact brutality is the name of the game. World opinion has not yet been stirred because the western powers prefer to look the other way when Pakistan, their god-son, indulges in mayhem. It comes as a shock to know that among other thing the 'militants' have destroyed 1,264 government buildings, 758 educational institutions, 9,309 houses, 1,659 shops, 243 bridges and nine hospitals. Why
don't we call a spade a spade The
hijacking of the Indian Airlines plane is part of the larger Pakistani
strategy and it must be identified as such. Pakistani officials will
continue to deny having any part in the hijacking but their behaviour
is all of a piece with their denying their part in the Kargil Affair.
Till the very last - in the face of mounting evidence, Pakistan continued
to deny its role. Pakistan evidently functions under the belief that India dare not taken action against it in the belief that Hindus are cowards and will not retaliate. It was that belief that led Gen. Musharraf to undertake the Kargil adventure. Pakistan's designs were foiled by the brave Indian Army. The hijacking of the Indian Airlines plane is a further follow - up to test Delhi's nerves, challenge has to be picked up. India's patience with its neighbour has been remarkable and consistent with its stand that it will not provoke a war not allow itself to be provoked.
But how long is it going to continue this stance? Gen. Musharraf says that he will continue to give moral and other assistance to the 'militants'. We now know what that assistance means. Pakistan understands only one language; violence. It will continue to speak that language until it is convinced of its futility. It is for India to teach our neighbour that lesson. The United States officials have been heard to say that India is a "great friend" of America. The sure way to show this friendship is for the U.S to unequivocally condemn Pakistan as a terrorist state and apply more sanctions against it. Pakistan has been mollycoddled long enough. The time is long past for the entire world - and not just the Western powers - to put Pakistan in its place. How many more Kargils, how many more hijacking need to be enacted for western powers to wake up to reality? The rise of Islamic extremism around the globe has been phenomenal in recent years no doubt spurred by the belief that no concerted action will be taken by the victims. The best answer to Osama bin Laden is given by giving Pakistan an open and resounding slap on its face - now. Osama bin Laden functions with the tacit support of Pakistan. The best way to strike at Bin Laden is by striking at Pakistan. And surely, the United States knows how to do it? If it could dare to hit Iraq, its one-time friend, surely it can dare to hit at Pakistan now? And not necessarily militarily? Does Washington need to be told the techniques of arm-twisting at which it is an adept?
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||