|
Interview
Of The Week
- S.
RAMADOSS
______________________________________________
‘I
’ve never had any links with Veerappan, I have urged him to release Rajkumar’
Pattali
Makkal Katchi (PMK) leader S. Ramadoss, a doctor-turned-politician has
been in the limelight. If a controversial note circulated among his party
men regarding Tamil nationalism raised eyebrows last week, a call from
the Karnataka Chief Minister S.M. Krishna asking him to appeal to forest
brigand Veerappan to release Rajkumar, surprised many. Why was Ramadoss
being requested to talk to Veerappan? Is it because that he has all along
advocated general amnesty for Veerappan? Or is it that the Vanniyar leader
could appeal to the sentiments of a fellow Vanniyar. Ramadoss in an interview
with B. KOLAPPAN discuss his
politics and the links with Veerappan.
Why
do you think S. M. Krishna asked you to prevail upon Veerappan to release
Rajkumar when two state governments are leaving no stone unturned to secure
the actors release?
I was
also surprised by the appeal. You must ask Krishna why he called on me.
I clearly told him that I have never had any links with the brigand, that
I could appeal to Veerappan only through the media, which I have done.
I have urged Veerappan to release Rajkumar without any conditions.
The
general opinion is that Krishna expects you to play the community card
to secure Rajkumars release. After all, Veerappan is also a Vanniyar.
There is no question of playing the community card in this case. Whether
at the time of elections or in the interests of the Vanniyar Sangam, we
have not invoked Veerappans name.
Have
you ever offered help to Veerappans family, especially to his daughter?
In our Mettur Assembly conference, the PMK was approached for financial
help to meet the educational expenses of Veerappans daughter. I
agreed to help.
What
do you say to the charge that the Tamil Nadu Liberation Army (TNLA) thats
now associated with Veerappan is amenable to the PMK since your party
leaders are associated with TNLA leaders?
There is not an iota of truth in the whisper campaign that the TNLA
has links with Kaduvetti Guru, a leader of the Vanniyar Sanghom.
From the very beginning, Guru has been working for the Vanniyar Sanghom
and the PMK.
Have
you made any special efforts to secure the release of Rajkumar after Krishnas
telephonic request?
In what way could I make special efforts? If I have links with Veerappan
I can make some efforts. I appealed to Veerappan through the media and
my role ends there.
Why
have you been advocating general amnesty for Veerappan?
There is no end to the problem that concerns three states. So much money
is being spent to nab him. The worst affected are the poor in the areas
of Dharmapuri and Erode districts. There is no solution in sight. So we
could end the problem by granting a general amnesty to Veerappan. We have
granted amnesty to the dacoits of Chambal Valley and to Phoolan Devi.
Since
many TNLA leaders and cadres are Vanniyars, would they listen to you irrespective
of their political affiliations?
Unemployment is one of the main reasons for the formation of extremist
groups in Tirupattur, Dharmapuri and Perambalur areas. People in these
areas live in abject poverty and depend heavily on money lenders who charge
nearly 15 per cent interest. The unemployed youth formed an extremist
organisation which later splits into factions. Some groups are even involved
in extortion. Of course, these areas are dominated by Vanniyars and the
first generation graduates and educated youth were attracted towards the
ideology of Naxalism. Not only Vanniyars, Dalit youths are also in these
movements.
Will
they listen to your appeal?
I have appealed to them to give up violence and return to normal life.
I urged them to hand over the arms they secured from a police station
in Andimadam. The extremist path is not going to help them. One day, the
police will shoot them down and declare that they were killed in an encounter.
Former DGP Walter Dawaram killed so many youths and called it encounter
deaths. These days you cannot even shoot a sparrow or a wild animal without
raising a protest. Maneka Gandhi will raise an issue.
Dravidian
parties that had mobilised the people on ethnic lines have now moved to
mainstream nationalism, losing their regional identity. Do you subscribe
to this?
Dravidian parties are responsible for this. To avoid this mistake,
since 1991, I have been advocating that the two Dravidian parties should
not have an alliance with any of the national parties. The DMK and AIADMK
can fight with each other to establish their supremacy or forge alliances
with other regional parties. In fact, it is the two Dravidian parties
that have contributed to the growth of national parties in the State by
offering 20 seats in the Lok Sabha elections.
So
should national parties be boycotted?
What is the contribution of national parties to the state, especially
the Congress?
But are you not in the BJP front?
PMK is a small party. My advice is only to the AIADMK and the DMK.
Next
- Straight
Face
|