Indian Express Group LogoExpressindia Group Logo
KashmirLive Web  
Go
 
 
  Kashmir Live
  KASHMIRLIVE
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Kashmiri Pandits
 
 
 
  GROUP SITES
 
  Expressindia
  The Indian Express
  The Financial Express
  Latest News
  Screen
  Express Cricket
  Loksatta
  Lokprabha
  North American
Edition [Print]
  COLUMNISTS
 
  The Indian Express
  The Financial Express
  SERVICES
 
  Bost Jobs
  Hotel deals
  Hot Travels
  Indian Classified Ads
  Cricket
 CHANNELS
 
  Astrology
  Shopping
  Express Classifieds
  Express Estates
  Express Money
  Express Travel
 SUBSCRIPTIONS
 
  Free Newsletter
  Wireless Express
  SYNDICATIONS
 
  RSS FEED LINKRSS Feeds
  RESOURCE LINKS
 
  Cricket

 

Judeo video: BJP, Opp trade names

Send Feedback   E-mail this story   Print this story

Posted online: Thursday , December 11, 2003 at 0000 hours IST

NEW DELHI, December 10:

The BJP and the Opposition debated over the fine points of the Judeo tape controversy today while referring to the Jogi controversy without naming Ajit Jogi, as per the rules of the House.

Advertisement
 
RELATED STORIES
 Hema for dream ‘film museum’
 ‘Enough laws to protect women’
 IAF, George speak in different voices
 Joshi evasive,Opp grills him over cuts in education fund
After the Prime Minister’s statement in the Lok Sabha today, the BJP tried defending Judeo while the Opposition demanded a joint Parliamentary inquiry into the case.

SP’s Ramjilal Suman called Vajpayee’s statement ‘‘bland’’ and said that his claim that the government does not interfere with the CBI does not hold ground keeping in view the government’s ‘‘history of corruption’’. He demanded an explanation on why Judeo was sacked. ‘‘I am sure the government wanted to save Judeo and but for the Assembly elections, he would have been,’’ he said. ‘‘We want to know what kind of probe is being held into the episode when Judeo himself has accepted he has taken the money,’’ he said.

In his defence of Judeo, BJP MP Anadi Charan Sahu said: ‘‘It is alleged that this was being done for an Australian firm. But I feel, the Australians would know whether the minister can be useful. Judeo was not capable of giving any benefit.’’

‘‘He was in-charge of wildlife development and environment education. A firm which comes all the way from Australia will not spend money on a man who has nothing to do with the project,’’ he said.

Referring to Jogi as a ‘‘megalomaniac’’ bent on retaining power even when he lost the mandate, Sahu said: ‘‘Judeo at least did not take money to thwart democracy. He said he took the money for stopping conversions.’’

Congress MP Pawan Bansal found it hilarious that if Sahu was right then BJP ministers accepted money even when they could not do anything for a project. ‘‘This is a double fraud. Even a person who cannot give the benefit, which he knows is being sought from him, still takes the bribe. For the BJP anyone who comes is welcome, they would immediately take them to five-star hotels,’’ he said. ‘‘I appreciated the PM when he accepted Judeo’s resignation. But as usual, the next day there was ambivalence in his stand,’’ Bansal said.

Send Feedback   E-mail this story   Print this story




 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
© 2006: Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Ltd. All rights reserved throughout the world.