|
‘We
are the only party with a mass base in Jammu & Kashmir’
 |
|
Omar
Abdullah
|
Omar
Abdullah, 31, son and heir of Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister
Farooq Abdullah, has recently attracted attention for being
a perennial member of the team accompanying Prime Minister Atal
Behari Vajpayee during his visits abroad. His credentials —
family lineage, secular outlook, urbane manners and member of
the Lok Sabha from Srinagar — make him the ideal Muslim face
of the NDA government, particularly when Jammu and Kashmir is
faced with militancy. PRADEEP KAUSHAL
talked to him about a host of issues including Kashmiri groups
reaction to the Centre’s peace initiatives in the Valley. Excerpts.
How
do you feel, being a successor to Jammu and Kashmir Chief
Minister Farooq Abdullah?
There
is no question of my being a successor to him. Jammu and Kashmir
does not have a monarchy. My father has not passed me a a
chair to occupy. I have contested and won two Lok Sabha elections.
This success has come to me for what I am and not because
who I am.
You
have acquired the image of a pin-up boy, endowed with good
looks and charm. How do you take to it?
I
wish people reflected on my work as a minister, rather than
my looks, which I have inherited. If I indeed have the image
of a good-looking guy, let it be. I am not too bothered about
it.
You
have become a permanent fixture on the delegations accompanying
Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee during his foreign visits.
Don’t you feel that you are being exhibited as a show-boy,
the Muslim face of the NDA?
I
do not perceive myself a Muslim leader. There are many others,
who are better qualified to play this role. I represent the
people of my constituency in Parliament. I believe that the
prime minister takes me along on his foreign tours because
of the portfolio of commerce, which I hold. As for my being
the Muslim face of the NDA, I think if that would be so, the
BJP would prefer propping up a Muslim from within its own
ranks because that would get it a greater publicity mileage.
How
much do you think you are like your father Farooq Abdullah?
We
are two separate persons. He is far more charismatic and outgoing,
comfortable in large gatherings. However, a part of his is
within me. Naturally, there are many thing which we share.
And,
what about your grandfather?
I
did not get to see him much. I was barely 12 when he died.
It is not possible for me to count his personal qualities.
However, I admire him for his vision, qualities of leadership.
He had the foresight to see that Jammu and Kashmir would be
better off with India than Pakistan, its Islamic nationhood
notwithstanding. Anybody can see today that India is a much
stronger, stable and successful and secular nation, when compared
to Pakistan.
What
future do you foresee for Jammu and Kashmir in the given circumstances?
Its
immediate future is clouded in turmoil. However, the recent
path-breaking initiative of the prime minister would change
the situation.
Do
you have such high hopes from the proposed summit meeting
between Vajpayee and Pakistan CEO Parvez Musharraf?
It
is only a beginning, which would succeed in breaking the ice.
The issues dogging the relationship between the two countries
for the last 50 years would not get resolved in just one meting.
Why
are you so much against the Hurriyat?
Because
we do not accept its claim that it is the sole representative
of the people of Jammu and Kashmir. We feel that the National
Conference too has a key role to play. As a party with the
longest history in the state, the National Conference can
not be wished away.
The
Hurriyat contention is that it is they who count at the grassroots-level.
To
the contrary, we are the only party with a mass base. If it
was not true, why would National Conference workers be killed
daily. On the other hand, the Hurriyat standing among people
remains untested.
Which
way do you think the Hurriyat would go hence?
A
section of the Hurriyat, which is pro-Pakistan, like the Jamaat,
would chalk out a new agenda for itself. The rest would adopt
a different course, paving the way for some realignments.
They have already started making different noises and are
positioning themselves in line with a future shift. The change
in Shabir Shah’s stand is a pointer to what is forthcoming.
He first talked of UN-supervised elections.
Now,
he is talking of elections overseen by intellectuals of India.
Barring two or three leaders, no one in the Hurriyat can claim
having a mass following. Even in the case of Maulvi Omar Farooq,
the most popular Hurriyat leader, the appeal is religious,
and not ideological. He may be talking of ‘‘Azadi’’ today,
but I am sure, when the time comes, he would stand out with
the same gusto with which he singed the 1983 pact, called
the Double Farooq Pact, with my father in 1983 or went to
receive former prime minister Morarji Desai at the Srinagar
Airport when other parties had boycotted his visit.
There
is a feeling that the National Conference Government in Jammu
and Kashmir has failed to make any impact. Do you agree?
A
false impression has been created that our government has
not performed. Even six years of militancy have not been able
to wipe off our achievements. There was a time when doctors
at the Sher-e-Kashmir hospital used to be out and the militants
used to be secure in beds meant for patients. However, we
have brought an end to this situation. Today, parties like
the Jamaat are charging us with ‘‘gaddari’’ for having built
bridges and schools. If the creation of assets for people
is ‘‘gaddari’’, well, we have this ‘‘gaddari’’ as our achievement.
|